pasobhonest.blogg.se - Henry iv part 1

#Henry iv part 1 free#

Others tell truth (lubricated by the usual lies of social life), or cautiously evade it. And Falstaff, who exhales falsehood, rarely expects to be believed. Moreover, while it is true that several of the characters are prolix - Hal, Falstaff, Hotspur, even old Henry Bolingbroke (let's face it, Shakespeare usually gives lots of words to his major characters!) - and much may be revealed thereby, yet they are not, in general, re-inventing themselves - or if they are, it is not through prolixity (Bolingbroke, of course, reinvented himself in Richard II as a king). In "Themes and Interpretations" the phrase "prolix inventions" is not useful - it has no referent, either in Wikipedia or on Google. Moreover, "drowsy and pudgy" hardly describes Falstaff - "fat, vital, and clownish" comes closer.- Jrmccall 00:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

As to Falstaff's seal-ring, the text does not support the statement either that the Prince ever took it, or that it was valuable.

The trick Poins and the Prince played on Falstaff had them dressing in buckram - not in Kendall Green.

Hotspur led the battle at Shrewsbury, but not necessarily the rebellion as a whole, which had several co-equal leaders.

the rebellion was coming from the Scottish, yes, but also Wales, the Archbishop of York, Edmund Mortimer, and the Percies.

There are several factual errors in the "Plot" section:

Propose move to Henry IV, Part 1 and ( Part 2)Īre the ideas of "ideal king" and Machiavel neccessarily mutually exclusive? Arguably Hal became the ideal Machiavellian king? Without any more detail about what is meant by "ideal king" the section is a bit unclear would the author care to expand upon their concept of ideal king? - Trithemius 00:55, (UTC).

Propose move to Henry IV, Part I and ( Part II).

Propose move to Henry IV Part 1 and ( Part 2).

Propose move to Henry IV Part I and ( Part II).

Do not move the page from Henry IV, part 1.

That is, which of the following is preferred? Quuxplusone 02:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC) Approval voting is encouraged for page moves requested on WP:RM. The questions are, first, whether to use Roman or Arabic numerals, and second, whether to keep or remove the comma. Quuxplusone 02:05, 30 July 2005 (UTC) The current title ( Henry IV, part 1) is obviously incorrect. I'd like to see the consensus on Roman versus Arabic numerals and comma versus no comma before moving the page, though hence. Henry IV, part 1 → TBD – The "P" in "Part" should definitely be capitalized.

6 Add mention of Marlowe's purported coauthorship.

Shakespeare Wikipedia:WikiProject Shakespeare Template:WikiProject Shakespeare Shakespeare articles

If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. Elizabethan theatre Wikipedia:WikiProject Elizabethan theatre Template:WikiProject Elizabethan theatre Elizabethan theatre articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elizabethan theatre, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. Theatre Wikipedia:WikiProject Theatre Template:WikiProject Theatre Theatre articles

#Henry iv part 1 free#

To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion. This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia.